Click to expand. But you know what? I have a DUAL LAYER DVD burner and no dang dual layer discs. Can't find them for under $4 a piece and thats if I can find them and none are 4x just 2.4x.

Kind of like SATA drives. Try to find the 400gb Seagate SATA drive locally anywhare. They all still use PATA. I don't think I have ever seen a SATA II drive anywhere yet. Pny attache driver.

So these technologies are great only if they are supported. Give me a mac that uses PC video cards then I will be happy. Ohhhh, will that be the Mactel? (mouth watering). But you know what? I have a DUAL LAYER DVD burner and no dang dual layer discs. Can't find them for under $4 a piece and thats if I can find them and none are 4x just 2.4x.

Kind of like SATA drives. Try to find the 400gb Seagate SATA drive locally anywhare. They all still use PATA. I don't think I have ever seen a SATA II drive anywhere yet.

So these technologies are great only if they are supported. Give me a mac that uses PC video cards then I will be happy. Ohhhh, will that be the Mactel?

(mouth watering). Click to expand.Yes I am aware of the dual-layer disc problem, but I still favor forward-looking technologies.

Why Cuda Will Have No Widespread Adoption For Machines

Some technologies will be adopted more slowly than others, but if I am to spend $3000 on a PM, I want it to incorporate the latest existing technologies. Hitachi, Samsung and Western Digital have SATA-II drives on the market. I expect the PM to have a 4-5 year lifespan, and in that time I have every confidence in a widespread adoption of SATA-II.

Why Cuda Will Have No Widespread Adoption For Mac Free

My point: Don't cripple the machine's future right from the start. Your standards may vary.